Comments

  Lech_Stepniewski 29. May 2010, 12:33
The coin is indeed unlisted in RIC, but was minted at Rome, not at Arles! There is "PR" in exergue and the style is apparently Roman.

Should be listed in RIC VI after ROMA 286.
  cepasaccus 28. May 2010, 19:53
Probably fake.

- withdrawn
- same dies as unsold/withdrawn coins
http://www.acsearch.info/record.html?id=178412
http://www.acsearch.info/record.html?id=62505
  cepasaccus 28. May 2010, 19:53
Probably fake.

- withdrawn
- same dies as unsold/withdrawn coins
http://www.acsearch.info/record.html?id=3200
http://www.acsearch.info/record.html?id=62505
  cepasaccus 28. May 2010, 19:51
Probably fake.

- unsold
- same dies as withdrawn coins
http://www.acsearch.info/record.html?id=3200
http://www.acsearch.info/record.html?id=178412
  Pscipio 28. May 2010, 09:58
http://www.forumancientcoins.com/fakes/albums/userpics/17499/MACER03.jpg

http://www.forumancientcoins.com/fakes/albums/userpics/17499/MACER03~0.jpg
  Pscipio 28. May 2010, 09:50
This is a modern plated fake. The same dies have also been used to strike fakes on solid silver.

Lars Rutten
  Lech_Stepniewski 25. May 2010, 12:40
"RIC:-" suggests that the coin is unlisted in RIC. In fact, it is RIC VI SISCIA 137b.

This mistake is frequently the result of overlooking that the legend marks on page 468 are superseded by new ones on page 469.