Published modern forgery.
http://www.forgerynetwork.com/asset.aspx?id=aJ2E9XBi4tk=

= papillon 8, 246

= Demos 4, 162

= Glendining 12/11-12/122 1975, Lot 79

It seems that this issue was mis-attributed to the city of Tyndaris by RPC. That attribution was always highly questionable, which is documented in the RPC notes for this issue. New evidence has come to light. In a recent European auction, an example of this type has clear obverse legends. It reads: "AVGVSTVS ACRAG" (or similar). This is a reference to the city of Akragas/Agrigentum. Perhaps a better way to classify this type is "Sicily, Uncertain mint (Agrigentum?)".

It seems that this issue was mis-attributed to the city of Tyndaris by RPC. That attribution was always highly questionable, which is documented in the RPC notes for this issue. New evidence has come to light. In a recent European auction, an example of this type has clear obverse legends. It reads: "AVGVSTVS ACRAG" (or similar). This is a reference to the city of Akragas/Agrigentum. Perhaps a better way to classify this type is "Sicily, Uncertain mint (Agrigentum?)".

Ariarates

Edward Perry Warren, Regling (Published 1906) No 948; Hubert Collection; Maxime Collignon, Feuardent Freres, 1919, Lot 286, sold 360 Fr; Robert Jameson No 2113; Collection Hirsch (from Vinchon catalogue - not recorded in Hess - Leu Hirsch auction); Jean Vinchon, Paris 26. April 1999, Nr. 171, estimate 2800 -3200Fr, sold for 4800Fr, BCD underbidder for 4500Fr for DH; Künker 362, 23 March 2023, Lot 124. Dengate 10b (incorrectly recorded as Boston MFA, this coin did not enter that collection).

And yet facts show that the past attribution to Ptolemy IV does not hold up. Read the book, not Hoover's "complete pseudo-science" review. Facts do matter. Cleopatra VII attribution is supported by lack of central dimples, weight standards, relationship with similar coins, etc. Matt Kreuzer

Die Münze ist von 1974, nicht von 2000

This coin (since conserved) also illustrated on the title page of Leonard Forrer's (1969) Portraits of Royal Ladies on Greek Coins.

Stumpf 72. ΑTTAΛΟΥ MANTIΘEOY, magistrates

same obverse as an addedomaros

ex. Naville June 18 1923, 2745: https://doi.org/10.11588/diglit.19166#0216

= L. Naville, Ars Classica 8, lot 1333

Crawford 94/1 with retrograde N at 6 o clock obverse

Crawford 94/1 with retrograde N off-flan at 6 o clock

This is actually a Crawford 94/1a with retrograde N at 6 o clock obverse

For the type and style, cf Crawford 91/1b & see P. Debernardi & F. Carbone "The Ara Basilica and Smaller Victoriati Hoards from Paestum", NC 178(2018), pp 312, type 91A.

Missing Provenance: Ex Aes Rude Titano 42, 29 September 1990, 71

Not a victoriatus but a later quinarius of CN Lentulus circa 88 BC, Crawford 345/2

die Münze ist aus Mexiko, nicht Mauritius

The holder was actually correct; it's clearly Heraclea and it's RIC 68

= Pegasi 35, 36 = Roma 9, 56 = Gorny 224, Lot 39 = Astarte XII, 34

= Kunker 382, 32 = Naumann 115, 108 = Bertolami 109, 124 = Bertolami 83, 181

Finnland und Falkland vertauscht